Page 1 of 1
Linux - a bigger threat to freedom than Bin Laden
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 4:52 pm
by allix
We have a new president elected, and Change is coming to America. One of the first things the US government will change is the methods by which terrorists use computers to destroy targets.
Once Obama gets into office in January 09, Linux will be banned by the Federal Government. Linux is a threat to national security, and is most often used by terrorists to detonate bombs. Obama has already enacted a law to entirely ban Linux in the United States. Anyone who continues to use Linux after a specified date, will be prosecuted and charged as a felon for threatening the American government.
Linux is a bigger threat to National security than Osama Bin Laden. The reason that Linux is used to anhilate nations is because Linux has too many variations, and contains secret embedded codes which are too difficult to crack by authorities. Additionally, all versions of Linux contain subliminal anti-American messages, which is proof in itself that Linux has been authored by terrorists and terrorist organizations.
If you are currently using Linux, now is the time to begin to use another operating system before the ban on Linux becomes law.
Linux users are anti-American. If you want to continue to use Linux, please leave America and move to any foreign nation where terrorism thrives.
America, Love it, or Leave it !!!
http://indymedia.org.nz/newswire/displa ... /index.php
Re: Linux - a bigger threat to freedom than Bin Laden
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 8:19 pm
by greggh
This article made me very upset and angry. Couldn't they have done a little fact checking.
It's GNU/Linux damn it!!!
Re: Linux - a bigger threat to freedom than Bin Laden
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:32 pm
by Brian
HAHA, funny.
But seriously though, thanks to our current President, OBL has been living in a friggin cave dodging bat dung and scared sh*tless to come out. Compare that to pre 9/11 when OBL pranced around the world at will blowing up things, and no one did anything about it. And before you blame Dubya entirely for 9/11 (current admin must take some blame, of course), the planning for 9/11 started long before 01/20/01 which is before "they started hating us for our President." Bill Clinton's inaction after the attack on the USS Cole emboldened Bin Liden more than the 2000 election did. If you don't retaliate when they attack a friggin warship, what do you expect?
NSA Datacenter in San Antonio? Now who says all the tech jobs are going overseas?
Re: Linux - a bigger threat to freedom than Bin Laden
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:46 pm
by MattKingUSA
I agree completely.
Re: Linux - a bigger threat to freedom than Bin Laden
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 8:45 pm
by eddie
Bill Clinton's inaction after the attack on the USS Cole emboldened Bin Liden more than the 2000 election did. If you don't retaliate when they attack a friggin warship, what do you expect?
The issue in the middle east was aggravated by Clinton administration sending a lone missile to kill some alleged terrorists and it ended up hitting and killing non-combatants. Quick fixes never work, they just usually backfire.
As for the article, it took me a second to realize it was just foolishness. As much linux as I use and blog about, for a moment I could see a prison cell and or a firing squad in my future before .