[Wsuug] (no subject)
reese at inkworkswell.com
Tue Dec 29 13:35:00 EST 2009
On 29-Dec-09 11:04, James Albert Bowden wrote:
> this is an interesting little hack, you all may like, but this is directed
> to zachary, check it out. the media temple hackery.
Not to harsh the mellow, but Kelley and I originate from a Security
Awareness background so that part of me insists on saying something.
Are the WSUUG archives public or private?
If we are going to have materials like this in our archives, they
should be private IMO. I do not think we want to garner a reputation
for being a repository of or gateway to exploit code. Links to such
things should be visibly broken, the truly curious can reassemble
those links if they want to investigate - if the archives are public
and it is desired to keep them public.
I wrote Zach yesterday, he's out of town for a few days and will have
reduced Internet access as a result.
Andrew, would you attend to verifying the current status of the WSUUG
archives and take appropriate action if necessary? Or, write me offlist
for some alternatives.
More information about the Wsuug