[Wsuug] Conditional CSS revisited

[Kelley Walker]

Andrew wrote:
>> The only level it might matter to be pretty is from a an
error checking standpoint. It is said that female coders
write better code because they spend the time to make it
pretty. Which in turn brings syntax errors to the forefront
because they are easier to see.

They only article can find about this is here:
http://headrush.typepad.com/creating_passionate_users/2006/0
3/code_like_a_gir.html
I know there is a better one but I can't find it right now.
<<

----------------
Hadn't seen that, but this one
<http://blogs.wsj.com/biztech/2008/06/06/men-write-code-from
-mars-women-write-more-helpful-code-from-venus/> is about
how women write more helpful code (better comments).

I believe Reese made the pretty code comment because I'd
teased Zack about his work around and said, "so, basically,
you think conditional comments in the HTML are ugly?"

When I've repeated that conversation, a lot of people agree:
conditional comment hacks are ugly.


Kelley