[Wsuug] Conditional CSS revisited

[Jon Zuck]

It's Browser-Sniffing, 2.0.
jon

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Jason Wilson
<jason at jasonwilsondesign.com>wrote:

> "But when a design absolutely requires that one Webbrowser (IE6 probably)
> be fed different information than all others,
> because of known flaws in the rendering engine of that one browser,
> then what?"
>
> Then you use separate patch CSS files and call them in using conditional
> comments. There's no reason to muddy up your CSS on every single relative
> declaration. The way they do it just doesn't make any sense and will cause
> more work than help.
>
> On 16 Sep 2008, at 14:47, Reese wrote:
>
> But when a design absolutely requires that one Web
>
> browser (IE6 probably) be fed different information than all others,
>
> because of known flaws in the rendering engine of that one browser,
>
> then what?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wsuug mailing list
> Wsuug at list.wsuug.org
> http://www.thelinuxlink.net/mailman/listinfo/wsuug
>
>


-- 
Jon

http://rockom.net
http://www.frimmin.com
http://www.wildwebweaving.com
http://esperantohr.wordpress.com/

"Just sit there right now. Don't do a thing. Just rest. For your separation
from God is the hardest work in the world."
~Hafiz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.thelinuxlink.net/pipermail/wsuug/attachments/20080917/12e344f9/attachment.html