[Wsuug] Conditional CSS revisited

[Zach Young]

To clarify the +1000, that is agreement with Jaswa.

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Zach Young <young.zach at gmail.com> wrote:
> +1000
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Andrew Jaswa <ajaswa at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm not a fan of this concept. Though I've never used this service, I
>> don't think I ever would. The idea encourages you to write browser
>> specific CSS. Which then creates a maintenance nightmare. I would
>> encourage good solid markup and CSS that is cross browser compatible
>> and only use targeted CSS when you absolutely have to.
>>
>> It just seems like a bad idea and promotes bad practices.
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Reese <reese at inkworkswell.com> wrote:
>>> Has anyone ever seen - or used - conditional css implemented like this?
>>>
>>> http://conditional-css.com/
>>>
>>> I'm wondering how well it is supported in current and 1 or 2
>>> generations-removed Web browsers.
>>>
>>> Reese
>>> --
>>> Ink Works
>>> http://www.inkworkswell.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wsuug mailing list
>>> Wsuug at list.wsuug.org
>>> http://www.thelinuxlink.net/mailman/listinfo/wsuug
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Jaswa
>> andrewjaswa.com
>> wsuug.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wsuug mailing list
>> Wsuug at list.wsuug.org
>> http://www.thelinuxlink.net/mailman/listinfo/wsuug
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Zach Young
> 757.462.0045
> http://zachyoung.org
>



-- 
Zach Young
757.462.0045
http://zachyoung.org