[Wsuug] next meeting?

[Reese Howell]

Well actually, it's SGML but I'm not wanting to quibble (before filling
my hand with a cool frosty one anyway)...

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wsuug-bounces at list.wsuug.org 
> [mailto:wsuug-bounces at list.wsuug.org] On Behalf Of Zach Young
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 12:49 PM
> To: Web Standards and Usability User Group
> Subject: Re: [Wsuug] next meeting?
> 
> The standard is XML. The 'namespaces' are XHTML2 and HTML5 more or
> less. We'll discuss more Tuesday.
> 
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Reese Howell 
> <reese at launchint.com> wrote:
> > That's a nice thought but I don't see it going anywhere. I 
> mean, we have a
> > standardized building code at the state level, but 
> buildings within the
> > state are not standardized. Some are one floor and some are 
> multi-floor,
> > some are single residence and some house multiple 
> residences, some are
> > commercial and not residential - but the design code covers 
> all of them. So
> > leave the rendering engines out of it I think, that's where 
> the market
> > should have free rein - survival of the fittest and all that jazz.
> >
> > Reese
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: wsuug-bounces at list.wsuug.org 
> [mailto:wsuug-bounces at list.wsuug.org] On
> > Behalf Of Jason Wilson
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 12:22 PM
> > To: Web Standards and Usability User Group
> > Subject: Re: [Wsuug] next meeting?
> >
> > I want them to standardise the rendering engine as well, 
> that;d really help
> > smooth out the process. I envision a collaborative project 
> to build and
> > maintain the rendering engine. The browser companies can 
> remain competitive
> > on browser features and add-ons.
> > What good is a standard format without a standard reader.
> > On 30 Jul 2008, at 12:14, Reese Howell wrote:
> >
> > And why not? Those people who produce those specifications 
> go on and on and
> > on about standards-compliance. Well, standardize already, geez.
> >
> > Reese
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: wsuug-bounces at list.wsuug.org 
> [mailto:wsuug-bounces at list.wsuug.org] On
> > Behalf Of Jon Zuck
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:39 AM
> > To: Web Standards and Usability User Group
> > Subject: Re: [Wsuug] next meeting?
> >
> > Integrate the two languages? Not a bad idea.
> >
> > jon
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Reese Howell 
> <reese at launchint.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think HTML5 should be abandoned.
> >> Then take its changes and rework XHTML2...
> >>
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: wsuug-bounces at list.wsuug.org
> >> > [mailto:wsuug-bounces at list.wsuug.org] On Behalf Of Zach Young
> >> > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:20 AM
> >> > To: Web Standards and Usability User Group
> >> > Subject: Re: [Wsuug] next meeting?
> >> >
> >> > Maybe to honor our first (or one of our first) meetings we should
> >> > discuss the state of XHTML2, HTML5, etc.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wsuug mailing list
> > Wsuug at list.wsuug.org
> > http://www.thelinuxlink.net/mailman/listinfo/wsuug
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wsuug mailing list
> > Wsuug at list.wsuug.org
> > http://www.thelinuxlink.net/mailman/listinfo/wsuug
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Zach Young
> 757.462.0045
> http://zachyoung.org
> _______________________________________________
> Wsuug mailing list
> Wsuug at list.wsuug.org
> http://www.thelinuxlink.net/mailman/listinfo/wsuug
>