[Wsuug] Updated/new site

[Jon Zuck]

Doh! Title attribute!

On Jan 28, 2008 9:33 AM, Zach Young <young.zach at gmail.com> wrote:

> yes, the most sense is good.
>
> On Jan 28, 2008 9:29 AM, Andrew Jaswa <ajaswa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 27, 2008 11:18 PM, Zach Young <young.zach at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yea, I think we agreed wsuug was an acronym, though, W3C is
> > > exceedingly confusing on the topic. I remember having long drawn out
> > > candlelight debates with Andy over the topic.
> >
> > Yes we did agree that it was an acronym, but abbr is more widely
> supported...
> >
> >
> > > Not to throw more dissent into the discussion, but I usually prefer to
> > > use 'content' as the name for section #3 otherwise people get confused
> > > and think the body tag, and then I have to beat them up.
> >
> > Yea I tend to also use content over body. If you take a look at the
> > websites that google pulled together [1] you can see that they lumped
> > "text, content, main and body"  into the same group. The idea is to
> > call the division a name that makes the most sense.
> >
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> > [1] http://code.google.com/webstats/2005-12/classes.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wsuug mailing list
> > Wsuug at list.wsuug.org
> > http://www.thelinuxlink.net/mailman/listinfo/wsuug
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wsuug mailing list
> Wsuug at list.wsuug.org
> http://www.thelinuxlink.net/mailman/listinfo/wsuug
>



-- 
Jon

http://www.frimmin.com
http://www.wildwebweaving.com

"Just sit there right now. Don't do a thing. Just rest. For your separation
from God is the hardest work in the world."
                  ~Hafiz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.thelinuxlink.net/pipermail/wsuug/attachments/20080128/81477967/attachment.html