[Wsuug] Updated/new site

[Andrew Jaswa]

On Jan 27, 2008 11:18 PM, Zach Young <young.zach at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yea, I think we agreed wsuug was an acronym, though, W3C is
> exceedingly confusing on the topic. I remember having long drawn out
> candlelight debates with Andy over the topic.

Yes we did agree that it was an acronym, but abbr is more widely supported...


> Not to throw more dissent into the discussion, but I usually prefer to
> use 'content' as the name for section #3 otherwise people get confused
> and think the body tag, and then I have to beat them up.

Yea I tend to also use content over body. If you take a look at the
websites that google pulled together [1] you can see that they lumped
"text, content, main and body"  into the same group. The idea is to
call the division a name that makes the most sense.


Andrew

[1] http://code.google.com/webstats/2005-12/classes.html