[Lvlug] CVS: Single vs. multiple repositories
Joel B. Mohler
joel at kiwistrawberry.us
Tue Oct 17 17:50:15 EDT 2006
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 12:43, Randy Kramer wrote:
> But, I don't have subversion installed, so I started looking for an rpm,
> and accidentally (somehow) came across git--so I'll spend a little while
> considering that.
Just be aware that git is a pretty much a different beast than CVS or
subversion. CVS or subversion favor development with a single server holding
the authoritative copy. Whereas with git, you have a complete (commitable)
repository whereever you check out your data. They both have their place,
but if you are a single user you'll probably find that cvs/subversion usage
model is closer to what you are thinking.
More information about the Lvlug