[Lvlug] One Machine on Network can't see TCP/IP 192.168.0.1 (or .sometime...
LFessen106@aol.com
LFessen106@aol.com
Tue, 18 Dec 2001 13:47:08 EST
--part1_157.5f7a519.2950e92c_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 12/18/01 1:26:56 PM Eastern Standard Time,
rhkramer@fast.net writes:
> Randy Kramer wrote:
> > The connector looks OK, and looks clean, but tomorrow I'll rearrange the
> > cables and put this machine on a different connector.
>
> I interchanged the cables between .5 and .8, the odd behavior stayed on
> .8.
>
> I pulled the T off .2 and replaced it, no change.
>
> I guess I suspect the problem is one of:
> * the NIC in .2 is becoming marginal
> * there is something odd about its setup (in Windows -- I can't spot
> anything)
> * some odd thing related to the fact that I've disabled the on board
> NICs on .1 and .5
>
> I guess the other thing for me to remember is that .2 does respond to
> the arp who-has by sending the "is at", it just never sends the icmp:
> echo reply. Either it never sees the icmp: echo request, or ??
>
> Anyway, for the time being I can live with it -- when I rearrange my
> mail system, .2 will have to talk to .5 to request mail (but I could, by
> then, make .8 or some other machine the mail server).
>
>
Just replace the nic. I would lay money on that solving your problem.
-Linc.
In The Beginning there was nothing, which exploded - Yeah right...
Calculating in binary code is as easy as 01,10,11.
--part1_157.5f7a519.2950e92c_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 12/18/01 1:26:56 PM Eastern Standard Time, rhkramer@fast.net writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Randy Kramer wrote:
<BR>> The connector looks OK, and looks clean, but tomorrow I'll rearrange the
<BR>> cables and put this machine on a different connector.
<BR>
<BR>I interchanged the cables between .5 and .8, the odd behavior stayed on
<BR>.8.
<BR>
<BR>I pulled the T off .2 and replaced it, no change.
<BR>
<BR>I guess I suspect the problem is one of:
<BR> * the NIC in .2 is becoming marginal
<BR> * there is something odd about its setup (in Windows -- I can't spot
<BR>anything)
<BR> * some odd thing related to the fact that I've disabled the on board
<BR>NICs on .1 and .5
<BR>
<BR>I guess the other thing for me to remember is that .2 does respond to
<BR>the arp who-has by sending the "is at", it just never sends the icmp:
<BR>echo reply. Either it never sees the icmp: echo request, or ??
<BR>
<BR>Anyway, for the time being I can live with it -- when I rearrange my
<BR>mail system, .2 will have to talk to .5 to request mail (but I could, by
<BR>then, make .8 or some other machine the mail server).
<BR>
<BR>Randy Kramer</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>Just replace the nic. I would lay money on that solving your problem.
<BR>
<BR>-Linc.
<BR>
<BR>In The Beginning there was nothing, which exploded - Yeah right...
<BR>
<BR>Calculating in binary code is as easy as 01,10,11.</FONT></HTML>
--part1_157.5f7a519.2950e92c_boundary--