[Linux4christians] I need some advice.

[Billy F. Staggs]

Didn't the SBC vote a few years back to require "re-baptism" of members 
transferring from Churches that do not follow the doctrine of eternal 
security?  I recall having several discusses with some SB Brothers 
regarding this.  If I recall correctly, there was even the dismissal and 
subsequent reinstatement of a SBC counsel member in protest of this 
vote. I am told the local SB Churches in my area do not practice this 
"rule".

http://biblebeltblogger.com/index.php/religion/southern-baptists-to-reject-some-baptist-baptisms


Seems pretty Salvation oriented to me.... Perhaps I misunderstood your 
statement.


Respectfully,

--
bstaggs <><


On 5/16/2011 4:39 PM, dcolburn at bibleseven.com wrote:
>
>
>>  So I know that it was acceptable but the Baptist Church tells me I
>>  must reject my baptism and be re-baptised by submersion again or they
>>  will not accept me as a Christian. They also claim their theology is
>>  the "Absolute Truth" and give it higher regard than the Bible. Those
>>  are the local Baptists though. IDK about other Baptists.
>
> I do not know who are you "local Baptists" but Southern Baptist
> doctrine defines baptism and "non-salvific".
>
> Many may view you as in-rebellion for refusing the instruction
> of the Bible to be baptized as a public testimony of your faith, and
> as a first-act of obedience to your Lord, but not non-Christian.
>
>