[Linux4christians] OOT: My stand on Gay/Lesbian
d.kuntadi at gmail.com
Wed Sep 29 02:01:41 EDT 2010
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Karl Kleinpaste <karl at kleinpaste.org> wrote:
> I don't care who _handled_ the money. The fact is that money was
> available for their use. _Somebody_ among them was making a living so
> that somebody else(s) could be handling it. That Judas was one of those
> handling it is utterly immaterial.
You really don't know the lives of Jesus and his 12 disciple do you?
Mar 6:8 And commanded them that they should take nothing for their
journey, save a staff only; no scrip, no bread, no money in their
Mar 6:9 But be shod with sandals; and not put on two coats.
And do you think they work for money? No, they live on the mercy of
other people (live like beggars).
> No, you have not addressed it at all. You have attempted to draw
> inferences from Hindu culture as proof, an inadequate (as being not
> scriptural) source of information and argument to support a claim of a
> Christian thesis. Unsurprisingly, the thesis is wrong, independently of
> the attempt to use an improper source of support for it, because
> scripture does not tell us anywhere that aged-ness implies sexlessness;
> and indeed on the contrary, instruction in 1Cor 7 tells us otherwise,
> without limitation as to age.
This is not the "pearl/meat", it is just milk.
> What do you do with a married couple of any age, where the wife has,
> say, suffered cervical cancer and consequently undergone hysterectomy?
> Do you condemn this couple to sexlessness even at a young age? You are,
> after all, the proponent of "sex without intent for conception is
If they desire a miracle of God to give them children while having
sex, what do you have to say?
> I, uh, congratulate you on your tenacity on a failed argumentative position.
I am sure it is a winning position, it is just that I am not good
enough in explaining it to you.
More information about the Linux4christians