[Linux4christians] Shellfish Logic and the Defense of Homosexual Marriage - EXCELLENT!
Billy F. Staggs
bstaggs at staggs.net
Thu Jul 8 12:01:04 EDT 2010
Now I think we are getting to the real nature of our disagreement....
Exactly what do you believe is God's Word and what is not?
Not canonized yet? For me it was valid as soon as Paul, moved by the
Holy Spirit, penned it. Period!
Peter seem to believe that his comments/letters carried some weight:
(2 Peter 3:1–3) This second epistle, beloved, I now write unto you; in
both which I stir up your pure minds by way of remembrance: That ye may
*be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets,
and of the commandment of us the apostles of the Lord and Saviour*:
Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers,
walking after their own lusts,
And this was written before any official canonization I believe also.
On 7/8/2010 10:37 AM, David Kuntadi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Billy F. Staggs<bstaggs at staggs.net> wrote:
>> Add me to the list of those that disbelieve it is possible to call God a
>> liar and Lord at the same time. Which is in my opinion what you are
>> unknowing doing when you claim parts of the Bible are myths.
>> (2 Timothy 3:16–17) All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is
>> profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
>> righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto
>> all good works.
> That is circular reference. All scriptures could not include 2 Timothy
> for example. And possibly also not the old testaments as at that time
> it is not yet canonized (correct me if I am wrong). I have always
> wonder which writing does Paul refer to when he is writing this
> Linux4christians mailing list
> Linux4christians at thelinuxlink.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Linux4christians