[Linux4christians] OT: TAKE YOUR TIME AND READ THIS! FBI Summary of
case!
Fred A. Miller
fmiller at lightlink.com
Wed Mar 25 23:12:43 EDT 2009
Some of you have thought that I and others had gone off the deep end
for claiming that in all probability, Obama ISN'T an American born citizen
and therefore ISN'T eligible to be President, that he IS a usurper!! This
issue ISN'T going to just go away. He MUST prove that he is a natural
born citizen, which a growing number of Americans are sure he can't do.
Well, now we know that the FBI IS aware of the situation. This is long,
but please take the time to read ALL of it!
Fred
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=4979
Via InfraGard, the FBI is aware of the eligibility situation.
Who’s checking up on officeholder eligibility? Find out here
Home » Activism, Eligibility, Headline, POTUS
Report Released on Presidential Eligibility
Submitted by Phil on Wed, Mar 25, 20092 Comments
Report Released on Presidential Eligibility
Via Dr. Taitz’ site as well as EvilConservativeOnline, Lyle J.
Rapacki, Ph.D., consultant at Behavioral Analysis and Threat
Assessment, Vice President of Protective Services, has released the
following report regarding a current assessment surrounding the
President’s eligibility.
I have emailed Dr. Rapacki to further follow up on this report and
will be updating/posting as appropriate.
From the full report:
NOTE from Defend Our Freedoms Foundation Staff.
The below report states: “if Mr Obama fights unsealing his
documentation…there will be civil unrest unleashed on the streets”
InfraGrad has a Public Private Partnership with the FBI. The PPP
programs has been leveraged heavily from local to international levels
to render entities back into Panopolies. The term panopoly was coined
by Joseph Borkin, chief economic advisor of the Anti-trust Division of
the Department of Justice circa 1943, during his investigations of
I.G. Farben because the aggregation of businesses were much larger
than a monopoly or cartel. [Edit: InfraGrad should be InfraGard;
panopoly should probably be panoply]
What is InfraGard?
InfraGard is a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) program that
began in the Cleveland Field Office in 1996. It was a local effort to
gain support from the information technology industry and academia for
the FBI’s investigative efforts in the cyber arena. The program
expanded to other FBI Field Offices, and in 1998 the FBI assigned
national program responsibility for InfraGard to the former National
Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC) and to the Cyber Division in
2003. InfraGard and the FBI have developed a relationship of trust and
credibility in the exchange of information concerning various
terrorism, intelligence, criminal, and security matters.
====================begins
The report:
LYLE J. RAPACKI, Ph.D.
Consultant at Behavioral Analysis and Threat Assessment
Vice President of Protective Services
Reply:
American Academy of Forensic Counselors
Southwest Risk
Advisors, Inc.
American Psychotherapy Association
Post Office
Box 1595
Chandler, Arizona 85244
Licensed Investigator
Telecommunications:
Protective Intelligence Specialist and Agent
1-866-481-7712 – office
Information Warfare Analyst
480-440-5930 – cell
ASIS – Phoenix Chapter Membership Chair
LRapacki1 at Hotmail.com
FBI InfraGard – Arizona
Memorandum: WHITE PAPER DISCUSSION — NOT CLASSIFIED
PROTECTIVE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNICATION PI: 126:09
NOT CLASSIFIED — PUBLIC DISSEMINATION
March the 16th, 2009
Statement of Purpose:
The content of this White Paper is deliberately intended to
stimulate thought and discussion. Informational analysis comprising
global security, national security of the United States of America,
socio-political-economic forces as a dimension to national security,
culture, freedom in human rights, defense and the rule of law are
considered within the framework of this treatise.
Overview:
Beginning as campaign rhetoric, the question of Barak Obama’s
legal status as a citizen of the United States of America qualified to
serve as President, is moving toward a crescendo that might be heard
formally by the United States Supreme Court. Downplayed by many,
including U.S. Senators on the Republican side and even Senators
serving on the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee as late as Friday of
last week, a significant meeting occurred last Thursday, March 12th in
Idaho. The Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court was speaking
before a large audience (800 in attendance, including the President of
the Idaho State Bar Association) on the character of Abraham Lincoln,
when attorney Orly Taitz of Mission Viejo, California came to the
microphone and asked the Chief Justice if he would personally review a
legal brief and a complaint signed by over 325,000 American citizens
as to the Constitutionality of Barak Obama’s swearing-in as President.
Chief Justice Roberts personally agreed to review the legal brief
and the complaint saying such in front of the audience.
_______
Motions to be heard on this critical Constitutional matter have
been dismissed already, or not even accepted by courts in many states
– New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia, Washington, Texas, North
Carolina to name a few. But the issue will not go away; it is morphing
now to include active members of the Armed Forces serving in “Hot
Zones” or theatres of combat. The legal motion handed to the Chief
Justice warns: “If MR. OBAMA is not constitutionally eligible to serve
as President of the United States, then no act that he takes is,
arguably, valid, the laws that he signs would not be valid, the
protective orders that he signs would be null and void, and every act
that he takes would be subject to legal challenge, both in the Courts
of the United States of America, and in International Courts, and
that, therefore, it is important for the voters to know whether he, or
any candidate for President in the future, is eligible to serve in
that office.”
Just prior to this meeting, attorney Taitz sent Certified
Correspondence on February 27th to the U.S. Attorney General, the
Director of the FBI, Congressional and Senatorial Judiciary Committee,
et.al. with the stated purpose “demand for investigation and immediate
action in regards suspected crimes” identified as, but not limited to:
impersonation of a military officer, libel, defamation of character,
harassment, interference with judicial proceedings, breaking into the
computer system of the Supreme Court of the United States, forgery,
using cyberspace for voter fraud. Military officers from all branches
of the U.S. Armed Forces have joined in this action as Plaintiffs.
Among the petitioners are: Maj. Gen. Carroll Childers; Lt. Col. Dr.
David Earl-Graef; police officer and Selected Reservist Navy Commander
Clinton Grimes; Lt. Scott Easterling, U.S. Army now serving on active
duty in Iraq; New Hampshire state Rep. TimothyComerford; Tenn. State
Rep. Frank Nicely and others.
One of the “and others” is Harry Riley, a veteran who spent a
significant time serving in the Pentagon. This former officer said
the issue is basically over whether Americans will allow “the
trashing” of their Constitution. “Myself, along with hundreds of
thousands of other warriors, have fought for the U.S. Constitution.
The whole issue is one of constitutional crisis. How can an
individual become the Commander-in-Chief, or the president of the
U.S., with questions regarding his constitutional qualifications?”
The complaint filed with the U.S. Attorney General (now in the
hands of the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court) requests “relate
Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama II to test his title to president
before the Supreme Court.” This legal phrase essentially means an
explanation is being demanded for what authority Obama is using to act
as president. This is the only judicial remedy for violations of the
Constitution by public officials and agents. This legal right
established in British common law 800 years ago and was recognized by
the U.S. Founding Fathers to demand documentation that may prove – or
disprove – Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president.
The complaint further states: “As president-elect, Respondent
Obama failed to submit prima facie evidence of his qualifications
before January 20, 2009. Election officers failed to challenge,
validate or evaluate his qualifications. Relators submit that as
president elect, Respondent Obama failed to qualify per U.S.
Constitution; articles II and I; amendment XX paragraph 3.”
_______
What follows is the Summary of the complaint filed by Orly Taitz,
attorney in Mission Viejo, California. As you can imagine, the
complaint is thorough and long. I have replicated sufficient
passages so not to diminish the nature, spirit, scope or details of
the complaint but conscious of time to read and length, I compiled the
salient points in this complaint to save you from reading the 78 page
document. I will further attest that Exhibits and articles of proof
were also attached to the documents I reviewed. I will further attest
the investigator working this case for attorney Taitz is a licensed
Private Investigator in the State of California for the past
twenty-five years, and prior to this, served twenty years as a
Detective at New Scotland Yard. I will further attest that I have
reviewed documents containing additional names not previously
mentioned. Some of the names are active military and others are
retired at Lt. Col. and above rank.
Should it be discovered Mr. Obama is ineligible, a constitutional
crisis would ensue attempting to determine which of his executive
branch orders should be valid. If, however, this case continues and
Mr. Obama fights revealing his documentation, there are growing
concerns of civil unrest, or worse, being unleashed in the streets of
our nation. The economic crisis coupled with this type of a
constitutional crisis could prove to be a “flashpoint” that would test
conventional law enforcement and elements of homeland security.
_______
Summary of the Complaint submitted to U.S. Attorney General Eric
H. Holder, Jr.:
“Recently an active U.S. Army Officer, who is risking his life in
defending our country in Iraq, joined my (attorney Taitz) legal action
aimed at unsealing Barack Hussein Obama’s, aka Barry Soetoro’s,
(Obama/Soetoro) legal status and eligibility/legitimacy for presidency
of the U.S. The president needs to be a ‘natural born citizen – one
who is born in the country to parents (plural, both) who arecitizens
of this country.
This definition was recently unanimously confirmed by the U.S.
Senate in Senate resolution 511, presented by Senator Leahy in April
2008, as Senator McCain sought his legitimacy for the presidency to be
verified, and Mr. McCain therefore presented his long version original
birth certificate.
Mr. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen; he was a citizen of
Kenya here in the U.S. on a student visa, which by itself made
Obama/Soetoro ineligible for presidency, regardless of whether he was
born in this country or Kenya, or whether he later lost his U.S.
citizenship while immigrating to Indonesia and obtaining Indonesian
citizenship (by being adopted and naturalized), and later reaffirming
his Indonesian citizenship while traveling on a Indonesian passport as
an adult, and also most likely obtaining taxpayer funded financial aid
as a Foreign Exchange student from Indonesia (Indonesia did not allow
dual citizenship and any U.S. citizenship would therefore have to be
relinquished). Additionally, Obama/Soetoro’s paternal grandmother,
Sarah Obama, and the Ambassador from Kenya, Peter Ogego, made
statements that he was born in Kenya, and there is no record of him
being born in any hospital in Hawaii. HI Statute #338 allows foreign
born children of Hawaiian residents to obtain Hawaiian Certificates of
Live Birth (COLB), and those can be obtained based on a statement of
one relative only.
Additionally, Forensic Document expert Sandra Line has issued an
affidavit that Obama’s place of birth cannot be ascertained without
reviewing the original birth certificate. Dr. Chiymoi Fukimo,
director of Health Department for the State of Hawaii, issued a
statement that Obama has a birth certificate on file, but
intentionally refused to provide clarification, whether it is a birth
certificate for a foreign born child of a Hawaiian resident, whether
it was prepared based on hospital records or statement of one relative
only, or whether it is an amended birth certificate, created upon
Obama/Soetoro’s adoption by Lolo Soetoro, his Indonesian stepfather,
and showing him a citizen of Indonesia.
There are forensic questions raised about the short version
Certification of Life Birth posted by Obama/Soetoro on his web site;
lacking corroborating evidence such as name of the hospital, name of
the doctor, three signatures and a seal on the front of the document.
Similarly, Obama/Soetoro supporters used Cyber space previously,
in order to misinform and defraud American citizens and commit voter
fraud. On November 3rd, a day before the National elections, when
numerous voters questioned Obama/Soetoro’s Natural Born status and his
refusal to provide his long version birth certificate, an article
appeared on the Internet stating that a Virginia Judge reviewed
Obama/Soetoro’s original birth certificate and found it to be valid,
Obama/Soetoro to be a Natural Born citizen, and all legal actions to
be frivolous (Exhibit). This whole case was manufactured, and Cyber
space was used, to defraud American citizens….
I am also requesting an investigation into the financial dealings
of Barack and Michele Obama. Please see attached list of over 100
addresses for Barack Obama and a 100 business addresses for Michele
Obama. These are addresses obtained from a private investigator and
an intelligence service. Obama/Soetoro’s addresses are connected to
numerous different social security numbers. None of the 130 positions
listed for Michelle and Barry or Barack H. Obama were listed on their
disclosed tax returns. There has to be a corresponding search for
each and every employer that is listed. If those are salaried
positions then, there is massive tax fraud. And if those were
campaign contributions over the allowed limits then, there is massive
campaign contributions fraud, especially in light of over $300 million
in contributions that are unaccounted for. Which is it? What social
security numbers were used?
As you stated in your speech on Martin Luther King Day, Americans
should not be ‘cowards’, particularly when matters of race are
concerned. I was not a coward and prepared this large dossier, so I
hope you will not be a coward and instead order an expeditious
completion of this investigation and its subsequent prosecution.”
Conclusion:
Accompanying this complaint is a petition calling for an
appointment of a special prosecutor similar to the one appointed
during Watergate. The fact that Obama has not ordered Hawaiian
officials to release the document leaves doubt as to whether an
authentic Hawaii birth certificate exists. Similar concerns exist in
Mr. Obama’s refusal to release student records from Occidental College
in the early 80’s where he may have been a student under the name of
Barry Soetero, attending the college on aid for foreign students.
The action handed to the Chief Justice is on behalf 120 military
officers, many of high rank, and 9 state representatives. Purportedly
the room was stunned and silent as attorney Taitz and Chief Justice
Roberts engaged in an extremely brief exchange regarding these charges
which led to the oral promise made by the Chief Justice to review
them.
( END OF REPORT )
Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D.
Protective Intelligence Specialist and Agent
Information Warfare Analyst
FBI InfraGard – Arizona
0100 Hrs. m.s.t.
It’s important to understand that this is an assessment and that
reports such as this are produced all the time regarding any kind of
event for interested parties to better understand how to move forward.
Nevertheless, the FBI is aware of this situation.
--
"The fundamental premise of liberalism is the moral and
rational incapacity of the American people." ~ Fred Miller
More information about the Linux4christians
mailing list